The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous
regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons." This
is the heart of the Bush Doctrine from the president's "axis of evil"
address to Congress. And the nations that constituted that axis were
Iraq, Iran and North Korea.
Under this doctrine, Iraq was invaded, Saddam overthrown and his army disbanded,
though we have yet to find any of the "world's most destructive weapons."
With North Korea, the train has left the station. Pyongyang can now produce
nuclear weapons and may possess half a dozen. For nations like North Korea and
men like Kim Jong Il do not build costly and complex ballistic missiles simply
to throw conventional explosives across an ocean.
Which leaves Iran. With Moscow's assistance, Tehran has been constructing a
nuclear power plant at Bushehr. Once operational, Bushehr will, like Yongbyon in
North Korea, yield plutonium as a byproduct.
Last year, the International Atomic Energy Agency also stumbled on a secret
uranium-enrichment plant at Natanz. Its centrifuges were found to contain traces
of weapons-grade uranium. Highly enriched uranium, U-235, is a component of
atomic bombs. Little Boy, dropped on Hiroshima, had a uranium core. Fat Man,
dropped on Nagasaki, had a plutonium core.
Lately, an effort by Russia, France and Germany to have Iran open up its nuclear
plants to inspection has been rebuffed by Tehran. Having seen how America dealt
summarily with Iraq, but proceeds gingerly with North Korea, Tehran has likely
concluded that when a superpower is threatening pre-emptive strikes and
preventive war, only nuclear weapons can deter it. Those who do not have such
deterrents get the Saddam and Taliban treatment.
So it appears that the decisive test of the Bush Doctrine will come in Iran. And
that test is probably not far off.
The Israelis have reportedly practiced strikes on Iran by crossing Turkish
airspace and have special forces in the Kurdish regions of Iraq. There are
rumors Sharon has told the White House that if we do not effect the nuclear
castration of Iran, Israel will do the surgery herself, because she cannot live
under the cloud of an atomic bomb in the possession of the patrons of Hezbollah.
Enter the "cakewalk" neoconservatives. Though disastrously wrong about Iraq's
receptivity to U.S.-imposed democracy, and though they face disgrace and
oblivion if Bush loses, they have one last card to play: That is to have America
widen her wars with Afghanistan and Iraq with a pre-emptive strike on Iran's
nuclear facilities. For the neoconservatives, Iraq was simply Phase II of "World
War IV" for imperial domination of the Middle East and serial destruction of the
regimes in Iraq, Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia, as well as of Hezbollah, Hamas
and the Palestinian Authority.
The neocons have not abandoned this imperial project. Nor has Bush removed a
single one from power, though they may yet cost him his presidency. And the
neoconservative commentariat is again beating the drums for war – this time on
This is their hole card. If they can ignite a new war, the country may forget
how they bungled the old war. In escalation lies vindication.
And, in truth, Iran is a matter the president and Pentagon must address. Can we
live with an Iranian atom bomb, which will restrict U.S. freedom of action in
the Gulf and likely lead to proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Arab world?
Or is Iran the place where the Bush Doctrine must be applied, even if it
ultimately requires U.S. air and missile strikes on Iran's nuclear sites?
Given the overstretch of U.S. forces, the invasion and occupation of a nation
three times as large and populous as Iraq is off the table. And what would be
the probable result of America launching air strikes and starting yet another
fire in the middle of the world's gasoline station?
Tehran would likely retaliate by sending fighters into Iraq, stirring up Shia
guerrillas in the south, aiding anti-American warlords in Afghanistan,
sponsoring terror attacks on U.S. citizens and inciting Hezbollah to refire the
We could find ourselves in a third war with no allies save Israel. Another
consequence could be the disruption of oil shipments from Iran, Iraq and the
Gulf, a run-up in prices to $60 or $70 a barrel, and recessions in Japan, Europe
and the United States.
Presently, America and her European allies appear to be moving toward Security
Council sanctions if Iran does not render hard assurances it is not going
nuclear. But if the mullahs have concluded their only defense against U.S. or
Israeli pre-emptive strikes is a deterrent of their own – a not unreasonable
assumption given what happened next door – we are headed for a showdown that
will change our world forever.
© 2004 Creators
for printable version.
Click here for
Daily Column Archives