Rush From The NFL
October 8 2003
On Sunday, Sept. 28, Rush Limbaugh volunteered on ESPN's "Sunday NFL
Countdown" that Philadelphia Eagles' quarterback Donovan McNabb was
"overrated" and that sports writers cut him slack because he is black.© 2003 Creators
Three days later, Rush resigned as an ESPN commentator.
The size of the posse that pursued him and of the mob that lynched him
reveals less about Rush's views on issues of race than it does about the
malice of our media elite.
Let's review Rush's offending words in their entirety. After saying
McNabb was overrated, Rush gave the following as the reason why
sportswriters consistently praise McNabb beyond his desserts:
"I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The
media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. ... There
is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the
performance of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried
Has McNabb been given excessive credit for the Eagles' success? Has the
defense "carried the team"? Let's look at the record.
Before 2003, McNabb had been starting quarterback for three seasons.
According to sports author Alan Barra, writing for Slate, not once in
those years was the Eagle offense rated any higher than 10th in the NFL.
The Eagle offense's "10th place rank in 2002 was easily their best,"
writes Barra "In their two previous seasons, they were 17th in a 32-team
league. They rank 31st so far this year."
Adds Barra: "In contrast, the Eagles defense in those four seasons has
never ranked lower than 10th in yards allowed. In 2001, they were
seventh; in 2002, they were fourth, this year, they're fifth. It
shouldn't take a football Einstein to see that the Eagles' strength over
the past few seasons has been on defense ..."
Rush's comments, both about the Eagle defense carrying the team and
McNabb being overrated, appear, from the stats, to be dead on. His
opinion was rooted in fact.
Which brings us to the heart of the matter. Rush was not purged for
saying McNabb is overrated, but for saying that sportswriters cut him
slack because they have an emotional investment in the success of a
black quarterback. Rush was saying, in effect, that these sportswriters
are guilt-ridden scribblers who can't call it straight when it comes to
black coaches and black quarterbacks.
Which is why the writers howled louder than McNabb. For Rush had told
the truth not just about McNabb, but about them – and they can't handle
the truth. "Rush Limbaugh is right," writes Barra, "He didn't say
anything that shouldn't have been said, and in fact said things the
other commentators should have been saying for some time now. I should
have said them myself."
Now, there is nothing wrong with black folks or sportswriters wanting to
see a black quarterback enter the pantheon of greats with Johnny Unitas,
Terry Bradshaw and Joe Montana. Half a century ago, Catholics wanted
Johnny Lujack of Notre Dame to become a second Sammy Baugh. But it did
not happen. And it would be less than honest to say that Lujack achieved
greatness in the NFL. And if some of us should write that Lujack ranks
among the great pro quarterbacks of all time, any sportswriters should
have a right to say, "You're cutting him slack because he played for
And they ought to be able to say that without being hounded out of their
jobs for anti-Catholicism the way Rush was on this absurd charge of
Which brings us to the question: What, exactly, is "racism"? What does
the term mean? Certainly, a hatred of another race or ethnic group would
qualify one as a racist. And a segregationist might qualify, although no
one condemns the Black Caucus as racist for refusing to admit white
congressmen or black students for demanding separate graduations.
The answer? The term "racist" is a branding iron that has become the
exclusive property of African-American media and politicians and their
allies that they apply, at their discretion, to any critic who
challenges their motives or actions on the racial front. It is used to
smear adversaries and silence them. It is one of several terms used to
blacklist and destroy the careers of those who challenge a power elite.
Rush did the right thing in refusing to apologize. But, as a friend said
wisely, Rush should not have resigned. He should have forced the weenies
at ESPN to fire him and to publish the reason why they were doing it, so
the world could see how craven they are.
for printable version.
Click here to mail this article to a friend.
Click here for
Daily Column Archives