Was Dan Duped?
Patrick J. Buchanan
September 15 2004
Dan Rather, successor to Walter Cronkite
as anchor of CBS News, may be about to close out his career on a banana
Last Wednesday, Rather launched a "60 Minutes" pre-emptive strike
against the president. Rather's charges: Bush got into the National
Guard through pull, was an insubordinate officer who refused to take the
medical exam to keep flying and used clout to prevent his being
Rather's attack was based on four newly discovered memos said to be from
the personal files of Bush's squadron commander, Lt. Col. Jerry B.
Killian. The memos, writes the New York Times, indicate "Mr. Bush ...
failed to take a physical examination 'as ordered' and that his
commander felt under pressure to 'sugarcoat' his performance rating,
because 1st Lt. Bush ... was 'talking to someone upstairs.'"
Rather seemed to have substantiated the rumors about Bush's Guard
service, as his piece also featured an interview with former Lt. Gov.
Ben Barnes, who confessed to having interceded to get Bush into the
Texas Air National Guard.
Within hours, however, Rather's case was crumbling. From both
independent analyses of the memos and witness testimony, it appears that
Rather may have been duped into colluding with a scheme to use forgeries
to smear and sink a president of the United States.
First, the new Killian memos appear to have been produced on a word
processor that did not exist in 1972-73. They are written in a Times New
Roman typeface rarely found on old typewriters. The letters "th" in
"111th squadron" are written in a "superscript" few typewriters of the
Vietnam era had. And the spacing of the letters on the memos is more
like that of modern word processors than of early 1970s' typewriters,
where letters were of equal size.
Killian's widow (he died in 1984) and son say he never kept notes and
call the memos a farce. "No officer in his right mind would write a memo
like that," says Killian's son Gary, an ex-Guardsman himself, of the
memo in which Col. Killian says he is being pressured to "sugarcoat"
Bush's record of insubordination.
Rufus Martin, personnel chief in Killian's unit, also calls the memos
fakes: "I don't think Killian would do that, and I knew him for 17
On "60 Minutes," Rather identified the senior officer who was said to be
leaning on Killian. "Killian says [in his memo) Col. Buck Staudt, the
man in charge of the Texas Air National Guard, is putting pressure on to
'sugarcoat' an evaluation of Lt. Bush." But according to the Dallas
Morning News, Staudt was discharged from the Guard and gone 18 months
before Killian's memo was written.
Rather claims Maj. Gen. Bobby Hodges, Col. Killian's superior, confirmed
to CBS that the memos were consistent with what he recalls.
But ABC quotes Hodges as saying CBS mislead him into thinking the memos
were handwritten, and he thus responded, "Well if he wrote them that's
what he felt." Hodges now calls the memos a "fraud" that has been
If Killian did write the four memos, notes National Review's Byron York,
he would have to have been a complete hypocrite. For as he was allegedly
writing bitter memos to himself about Bush, he was praising Lt. Bush in
the official records in Guard files. Killian's widow says her late
husband was an admirer of young George.
As for Ben Barnes, his daughter Amy says her father is now lying. Barnes
is a Kerry fund-raiser and Nantucket neighbor of the windsurfer whose
story about intervening for Bush has changed over the years.
Despite the cloud over the authenticity of the memos, CBS says it is
conducting no internal investigation of how it got them or whether they
are authentic. Hard to believe. For the reputations of Rather, CBS and
"60 Minutes" are all on the line.
It should not be difficult to authenticate the memos. If they were
written by Killian over an 18-month period, then other memos about
unrelated matters, but with the same Times New Roman font, the same
spacing, the same signature and the same "superscript" should be there.
If, however, none are found, CBS may have placed its credibility behind
a criminal forgery to destroy a president.
Indeed, if these memos turn out to be fakes, CBS and Rather will be
guilty of, at least, having been played for fools. At worst, they could
be convicted in the court of public opinion of collusion in a plot to
bring down a president – a plot into which they were lured by a blinding
bias against George W. Bush.
© 2004 Creators
for printable version.
Click here for
Daily Column Archives